Jump to content

United Kingdom

  • entries
    130
  • comments
    793
  • views
    75144

Contributors to this blog

  • Chris Pawley 42
  • Simon Irvine 37
  • Daniel Crookes 27
  • VATSIM UK 7
  • Ben Wright 7
  • Nathan Donnelly 5
  • Kris Thomson 2
  • VATSIM UK Web Services 2
  • Andy Ford 2
  • Oliver Rhodes 2
  • Adam Arkley 2
  • Gdpr Removed 1
  • Loui Ringer 1
  • Adam Farquharson 1
  • Kieran Hardern 1

New Deputy Division Director


Simon Irvine

3839 views

 Share

I have been thinking about bringing a Deputy back for the past few months but have held off.

It has not been easy as there are many people with the skills and attributes to do the UK2 job, and having been UK2 myself i know what it takes to be a great deputy.

With this in mind I am delighted to announce that Nathan Donnelly has accepted my offer to be the Deputy Division Director.  

Nathan is no stranger to the Division with previous staff roles in both pilot and more recently ATC training. Nathan has been great counsel to me over the past few months and has also been helping me with the Division review and will be continuing to help with this over the next few weeks.

Nathan begins his new role with immediate effect and he will also continue in his TGI role.

I am looking forward to having Nathan's drive, enthusiasm and impeccable music taste on the DSG.

 Share

28 Comments


Recommended Comments



Henry Cleaver

Posted

All the best in your new role, a hard but very worthwhile and fulfulling one.

Link to comment
Jake Halliday

Posted

Just wondering why people's downvotes have been removed on this post? :unsure:

Link to comment
Louie Lister

Posted (edited)

2 minutes ago, Jake Halliday said:

Just wondering why people's downvotes have been removed on this post? :unsure:

It has been removed throughout the forum. You can no longer down vote posts anymore, it was seen as a pointless button which only really started arguments on here.

Edited by Louie Lister
Link to comment
Harry Cameron

Posted

Just now, Louie Lister said:

It has been removed throughout the forum.

Strange how when a post about a new "Deputy Division Director" gets 3 down votes they remove the down votes as a whole, sounds very coincidental to me

Link to comment
Louie Lister

Posted

1 minute ago, Harry Cameron said:

Strange how when a post about a new "Deputy Division Director" gets 3 down votes they remove the down votes as a whole, sounds very coincidental to me

Everyone has their views I guess. 

Link to comment
Simon Irvine

Posted

Hello

As per the DSG minutes from 22nd of June, we were reviewing whether to get rid of the negative reputation button on the forum.

If you disagree with this then you can start a new thread about your concerns about that particular decision.  This is not the thread for that.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Harry Cameron

Posted

Just now, Simon Irvine said:

Hello

As per the DSG minutes from 22nd of June, we were reviewing whether to get rid of the negative reputation button on the forum.

If you disagree with this then you can start a new thread about your concerns about that particular decision.  This is not the thread for that.

 

 

 

Very coincidental that this happens when people do not agree with a move by the DSG...

Link to comment
Andy Ford

Posted (edited)

9 minutes ago, Harry Cameron said:

Very coincidental that this happens when people do not agree with a move by the DSG...

Well if they disagree so much, they can go and make another thread (as Simon has said) and explain their opinion with sources to back up their claims. Hitting a "dislike" button instead of giving a well thought-out and structured argument is such a cop out.

"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." - Christopher Hitchens (taken out of context in this case, but the literal meaning of the words still stands)

Edited by Andy Ford
Link to comment
Jake Halliday

Posted

8 minutes ago, Andy Ford said:

Well if they disagree so much, they can go and make another thread (as Simon has said) and explain their opinion with sources to back up their claims. Hitting a "dislike" button instead of giving a well thought-out and structured argument is such a cop out.

"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." - Christopher Hitchens (taken out of context in this case, but the literal meaning of the words still stands)

Well, in that case, shouldn't the 'like' button be removed seeing as people aren't giving a reason for their likes?

Link to comment
Fraser Cooper

Posted

1 minute ago, Jake Halliday said:

Well, in that case, shouldn't the 'like' button be removed seeing as people aren't giving a reason for their likes?

 

13 minutes ago, Harry Cameron said:

Very coincidental that this happens when people do not agree with a move by the DSG...

Stop Hijacking this thread. What you have posted here is nothing about the announcement Simon has made. Any issues, start a separate thread or submit your concerns as a ticket. 

Link to comment
Anastasios Mpithas

Posted

Lets get back on topic, dont ruin the thread.

Congrats Nathan!

Link to comment
Andy Ford

Posted (edited)

15 minutes ago, Jake Halliday said:

Well, in that case, shouldn't the 'like' button be removed seeing as people aren't giving a reason for their likes?

A subtle difference.

The "dislike" button can (and has) cause a very negative and hostile atmosphere, which has turned away new members because they post something on the forum and everyone has just negative rep'd them. In my opinion, if you're going to put someone down, then you've gotta have a darn good reason for it. In short, getting rid of the button stops people just making everything negative with no justification and no discussion. If someone doesn't like something posted on the forum, especially with regards to staff posts - we actually want to know what exactly you don't agree with and why. If you don't at least give us that much, how can you ever expect your opinion to be heard.

The "like" button, doesn't create this atmosphere and it is equally a fair assumption that if "like" is pressed, that the person has no quarrels with anything that was posted. I would expect (as I do myself) anyone who has a caveat to their "like" to post it so that proper discussion can be had.

This is a forum - a meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged. This is not Facebook.

In any case, I shall derail this news item no longer. If people want to discuss the changes, then I suggest you create a new thread for it.

Edited by Andy Ford
Link to comment
Callum McLoughlin

Posted

What a shame that the childishness of some comes out in this thread. Perhaps if you grew up a bit your opinions would be taken more seriously.

Congratulations Nathan, I know you will do a fine job! :)

Link to comment
Matt Collier

Posted

Fantastic appointment. Congratulations Nathan :) 

Link to comment
Nathan Donnelly

Posted

Thanks all for your comments.

I look forward to the new and exciting opportunities that this role offers.

Please keep an eye on the Announcements part of the Forum over the next few days, as there could be some upcoming new and exciting opportunities for you, too.

 

Link to comment

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...