Jump to content

Heathrow - No ATC, so Which Runway?

John Pettit

Recommended Posts

John Pettit

Westerly winds, no ATC online at EGLL, so which runway do we use?

In the past I have always referred to the <Daytime Runway Aternation> programme for guidance [ see: https://www.heathrow.com/content/dam/heathrow/web/common/documents/company/local-community/noise/operations/runway-alternation/Runway_Alternation_Programme_2021.pdf]   or check EGLL NOTAMS for any temporary restrictions.

However, many do not know of this alternation programme, and it seems to be a 'free for all'. Does Vatsim have any guidance here?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Fraser Cooper

It's a difficult one.

There isn't anything in the CoC that says pilots should stick to IRL config, just that in the absence of ATC, pilots should broadcast their intentions on UNICOM.

Small grey area. CoC B5.

Would hope that others would 'follow the crowd' if someone was using the correct config but you never know.

Edited by Fraser Cooper
Link to post
Share on other sites
Lenny Colton
21 hours ago, Fraser Cooper said:

Would hope that others would 'follow the crowd' if someone was using the correct config but you never know.

Hope is sadly the key word here. Fair enough if the airport's empty at 3am and you don't want fly round to the other side, but it does become an issue when you log on LL at 5pm on a Friday to find all 4 runways in use at once.

Of course, when you send the contactmes, people rush to depart as soon as they can, rather than calling and getting put in line for another runway, which just makes things worse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • Janet Kino
      By Janet Kino
      I was practicing checking flight plans, and for a flight from EGPH to EDDB I discovered something I don't understand.  I'm sure there is some special rule that covers it.  The non-UK portion of the route was LAMSO DCT EVELI DCT OSN L980 HLZ P12 BATEL T207 OGBER.  Validating the route through the NOP portal, if flown at FL300 down to FL260 (since cruising below FL260, once you leave UK airspace, is not allowed), you had to descend to FL240 or lower at HLZ to meet the requirements of P12, BUT if you flew above FL300 you until BATEL to start you descent.  What is special about FL300 over that portion of Europe?
    • Ian Chalmers
      By Ian Chalmers
      Why do I get continuous ATIS in the New York area when all my radios are tuned to 118.00 and turned off apart from Comm1 which is on 122.800. Only VHF1 and Mic1 are selected yet I'm getting ATIS all the time which is a tad annoying. It goes away if I tune to anything other than Unicomm but comes back when 122.8 is reselected. Yes I can turn the volume down but then you can't keep a listening brief with that jabbering in your ear. 
    • Alex Ridge
      By Alex Ridge
      Hi guys,
      I try and stay out of any Vatsim drama etc but I must say that I have noticed a significant decrease in UK ATC online over the last 1 - 2 months. 
      I know restrictions are easing but it's the lack of area control that I have really noticed. 
      During the beginning of the year it was common to see multiple London sectors online, with top down EGLL / EGKK fully staffed and it's becoming rarer and rarer these days.
      Have I missed something here, I feel quite out of the loop. 
    • John Pettit
      By John Pettit
      I have just flown EGLL to EGPD. Scottish Centre were on line. An aircraft (details available) was having difficulty obtaining clearance from Scottish on 'voice' comms. I was able to hear Scottish but unable to hear the aircraft, although Scottish were able, intermittently, to receive the aicraft on voice. This resulted in the following transmission via text from the aircraft:
      08:22:03 "Callsign" OK you can just ignore me while I try to get ifr clearance ima have a word with your supervisor and i have this all recorded on video of u ignoring me and ill be giving you a very bad review gday (text as sent - ed)
      I was on frequency and I did not hear ANY of the offended aircraft voice transmissions. It appears to me that the problem lay with that aircraft's equipment rather than with ATC. Nonetheless, the reply from the aircraft was totally out of order, and not in keeping with VatSim philosophy. He should be ashamed of his response. This is a hobby and we should all be tolerant of the mishaps of others when they occur.
      The end result was that ATC went offline to check his own equipment, but never came back. A loss to all concerned.
    • Jake Stabb
      By Jake Stabb
      Is anyone interested in Re-creating some sort of large scale military operation like ( eg , crimson warrior ) one evening if allowed of course 
  • Create New...