Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Harry Sugden

discussion Found this too late!

Recommended Posts

Harry Sugden

Was scrolling through vHansard, and came across this! Looks like we missed the memo? Ah well, looks like a pretty cool format for temporary notices, so maybe next time.

Screenshot_5.png.99850bb71e9bcd34beba93c1751c4243.png

(p.s. this is not a criticism!!..... i just wanted to write something in the house of commons font)

Edited by Harry Sugden
my new font

Share this post


Link to post
Arvid Hansson

I beg to move that this notice be considered henceforth during scheduling of forthcoming CTP events, which - in order to satisfy members on both sides of the pond - shall be arranged and disclosed with appropriate timing to satisfy the appeals laid forth within the open letter written to the CTP Planning House by my Rt. Hon Friend, the member for Boston.

Edited by Arvid Hansson

Share this post


Link to post
Oliver Rhodes

You have far too much spare time on your hands...

Share this post


Link to post
Harry Sugden

I don’t find much to do at 1am other than listen to some ordaaaarrr and read EU Withdrawal bills in awe of the font!

The question is that this thread now adjourn.

Share this post


Link to post
Adam Turner

Should we go House of Lords' style? 

The question is that the question that this thread do now adjourn do now be put. 

Edited by Adam Turner
I should proofread

Share this post


Link to post
Nick Marinov

As many as are of that opinion say "AYE"

Share this post


Link to post
Michael Pike

And to the contrary 'NO'.

Share this post


Link to post
Alex Ashley

Too many acronyms spoilt the realism... 😉

(please do this seriously)

Share this post


Link to post
Harry Sugden
11 minutes ago, Alex Ashley said:

Too many acronyms spoilt the realism... 😉

(please do this seriously)

Mr Speaker, I would like to respond to the Right Honourable Gentleman's comments, if I may. You know, after I published the notice in question, I was kicking myself oh so metaphorically for including any sort of acronym that I hadn't introduced in its full form prior. I do so hope that he will accept my sincerest apologies, as I do wish to accept his statement as friendly and in good faith.

Share this post


Link to post
Alex Ashley
10 hours ago, Harry Sugden said:

Mr Speaker, I would like to respond to the Right Honourable Gentleman's comments, if I may. You know, after I published the notice in question, I was kicking myself oh so metaphorically for including any sort of acronym that I hadn't introduced in its full form prior. I do so hope that he will accept my sincerest apologies, as I do wish to accept his statement as friendly and in good faith.

Mr Speaker,

I accept the right honourable gentlemen’s sincerest apologies and I know as a most esteemed member of the house he will be severely disappointed in this minor error. It was not my intention to cause the honourable gentlemen to publicly regret his slip up as I am aware it is a blip in an otherwise unblemished parliamentary career.

Edited by Alex Ashley

Share this post


Link to post
Fergus Walsh

I will be suspending the rest of today's sitting due to the leak in the roof. Please leave AND NO PHOTOGRAPHS!

Edited by Fergus Walsh

Share this post


Link to post

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Similar Content

    • Ryan Boulton-Lear
      By Ryan Boulton-Lear
      Hello all ! Not wishing to open a can of worms here, but hoping for a bit of clarification regarding the booking of Manchester tower. Now there is obviously two towers "EGCC_N_TWR" and "EGCC_S_TWR" and it's always been a gentlemen's agreement so to speak from North Tower whether they wan't South tower open or not, so it's not really booked. Now I accidentally booked on the CTS "EGCC_TWR" which it let me do, and then another controller booked "EGCC_N_TWR" which it also let them do which overlapped the bookings then. So looking for clarification really on what you should be booking Manchester Tower under. However if there is no official rule my proposal would be:
      If someone books "EGCC_TWR" they are band boxing both towers, but if someone wishes to open EGCC_S_TWR they still ask EGCC_N_TWR if that's okay.
      If someone books "EGCC_N_TWR" then another controller can book "EGCC_S_TWR" and the controllers do duals for the time that South Tower is logged on with their bookings. 
       
      I look forward to any responses and hopefully we can get some clarification on this for the future !
       
      Kind Regards,
       
      Ryan Boulton - Lear
    • Simon Conway
      By Simon Conway
      Hi,
      It seems the smartCARS is windows only (an .exe file) which alienates mac users.
      Is it possible to supply all the necessary server details so if for example I were to use Xplane and a Mac (yes, I know!, a double whammy!!) I could use the existing XACARS application and enjoy the new (is it new?) training excercises? 🙂
      Thanks in advance,
      Simon.
    • Callum McLoughlin
      By Callum McLoughlin
      Hi all, can I challenge why both the head of training and manager responsible for ATC training both have a potential of holding S3 ratings? Why is it judged as appropriate for the vacancy for head of ATC training to also have a minimum of an S3 too?
      My question arises as the S stands for "student".
      Open minded, but would be interested in the justification/thought process behind this.
      Have a good weekend 🙂 
    • Jamie Paine
    • Andrew Macleod
      By Andrew Macleod
      So what’s actually happening with Slack channels now. I would have asked in what used to be discussion on slack but didn’t want to get shouted at so I came here, is there going to be any new ones? Or we keeping disciussion to the forums and using slack for minimal purposes now?
×
×
  • Create New...