Jump to content
Fraser Cooper

atc-discussion Coordination / Handoff Feedback

Recommended Posts

Fraser Cooper

Hello all,

In response to a LOT of ATC feedback regarding this, I felt it necessary to post a reminder regarding EVERY controller's obligation/requirement to conduct a suitable handoff to the next controller.

I have personally seen this happen a lot recently and from the ATC Feedback received, many others have observed it too.

The main problem here seems to be with Ground Controllers who are logging on/off without ANY coordination, but applies to all controllers at all levels. Stating 'Closed' is not enough.

The minimum I would expect to hear from a controller who is closing is 'Closing Now, No Traffic to Effect'

However, there are many cases where people are logging off without coordinating with Tower/Approach/Area or whoever is covering the airfield top-down with traffic on the ground. I can not count how many times I have heard from pilots - "With you on taxiway Juliet, ground seems to have logged off, request taxi".

It takes a few seconds to let the next controller what is going on.

- Aircraft who are cleared

- Aircraft pushing

- Aircraft Taxiing

This would be an example of handover from GND to Approach:


"Pass your message"

"Closing now, are you ready for handoff?

"Affirm, go ahead"

"Roger, all cleared except SHT2P. BAW26GT is pushing west, EZY12RF is taxiing to A3 and GLARS has just called for start for the VFR circuit"

(If handing over to a new ground controller, you would also include the ATIS, Runway in use and what adjacent control was also online)

"That is all coped, thank you"

"Ok, all aircraft coming to you on 126.825 now, Bye"

If you are are opening/closing, all coordination should be done via Teamspeak whenever possible.


If you are ever unsure, ask questions! If you don't know something, find an answer. There many mentors/instructions in VATUK and we are all here to help when needed.

Edited by Fraser Cooper

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • Harry Sugden
      By Harry Sugden
      Oooo, "cleared RNP approach runway 26L" soon come! 😎
      rnav to rnp.pdf
    • Sebastian Wheeler
      By Sebastian Wheeler
      Just a slight query related to the above:
      I was fortunate enough to partake in a weeks worth of work experience with NATS recently, and while at whitely on the ADC sims, I heard the following phraseology being used "G-ABCD, Cleared to enter controlled airspace via Route A, at or below altitude 2000 feet, QNH 1014."
      Upon asking one of the pseudo-pilots about the change, I was told it is "new phraseology" can anyone else confirm whether this is the case? Apparently, it was put in place after some confusion from pilots after receiving a "not above" clearance.
    • Steve Riley
      By Steve Riley
      Just reading the new sid charts , am I right in saying hand offs are going to LONDON or SCOTTISH  and not radar as no mention of Radar on the charts.
      2. After departure, aircraft shall remain on the Tower frequency until instructed. 3. En-route cruising levels will be issued after take-off by 'London Control'. 4. Report callsign, SID designator, current altitude and cleared level on first contact with 'London Control'.
      I have not got the old charts to confirm this as I take them straight from NATS web site. 
      Also frequencies have changed are we changing them within ES ?
        123.980, 131.005  BIRMINGHAM APPROACH/RADAR
        118.305  BIRMINGHAM TOWER
      121.805  BIRMINGHAM GROUND 

    • Thomas Wowk
      By Thomas Wowk
      As above, how do you guys assess the runway surface condition on VATSIM? Do you make a visual assessment from the visual control room in correlation to the current/prevailing weather conditions or do you assess this purely off the METAR/TAF?
      The only reason i ask it that the surface condition of a runway really affects our landing performance (each operators SOP's may be different for the same aircraft type) Specifically if the runway is declared as DRY full length our crosswind limitations may be increased, whereas if the runway is declared WET full length, crosswind limitations are decreased. If i also needed to return after departure due to an emergency and perform an overweight landing, a DRY/WET surface also makes quite a difference for our overall LDA requirements. 
    • Thomas Wowk
      By Thomas Wowk
      Hi all,
      For the ones who enjoy carrying out IFR circuits in large aircraft, Doncaster Sheffield (EGCN) accepts visual circuits for aircraft above 5,700kg - B737/B757/B767/B747 etc. 
      The circuit profile & procedure can be found in the textual data in the AIP for EGCN. Primarily speaking only one aircraft can be in the circuit at a time. Be nice to get TWR on at EGCN from time to time to accept more training traffic within the network.
      The circuit profile briefly summarised as below:
      Visual circuits by aircraft above 5700 kg must comply with the following noise abatement procedures.
      i. Runway 02 After departure turn right crosswind at no greater than 2.5 DME, fly downwind at 2000 FT QNH, report final south of Bawtry (3 DME) and not below 1500 FT QNH.
      ii. Runway 20 After departure climb on track 190°, at 1.5 DME turn left crosswind, fly downwind at 2000 FT QNH and report final not below 1500 FT QNH
  • Create New...