Jump to content
Alex Ridge

discussion Gatwick Crib

Recommended Posts

Alex Ridge

Hi guys,

 

With the new SIDs/STAR for 1806, I was kindly wondering when we can expect the updated Crib sheets.

 

Thank you,

 

Alex

Share this post


Link to post
George Peppard

As it's a fairly major aerodrome, I assume it's something being worked on.

Until it's finished, here's the routings:
273baa.png

Share this post


Link to post
Lenny Colton

This is very helpful @George Peppard! As the non-RNAV SAM is still in the sector file, I was unaware that I should be assigning NOVMA and IMVUR if SAM is filed.

Share this post


Link to post
Richard Keen

Although don't forget not everyone will have the new SIDs if they haven't updated their nav data so best to ask if they prefer one or the other.

Share this post


Link to post
George Peppard
5 hours ago, Lenny Colton said:

the non-RNAV SAM is still in the sector file

Still exists for one more cycle in RW for whatever reason. I believe it's being removed next AIRAC.

Share this post


Link to post
Nathan Innes

Touching up on the topic of the new Gatwick SIDs coming into effect. A lot of the current ground controllers are still unaware of what holding points they should be using whilst on these SID's.

Since they are still westbound departures the aircraft should be sent to holding points:

26L: A2

08R: J7

Share this post


Link to post
Adam Farquharson

Is it possible to get an E-mails sent out to all of the Gatwick endorsed ground controllers letting them know the new routings and new holding points because a lot of the controllers won't be active on this part of the forum and might not see that there is a change.

Share this post


Link to post
Louie Lister
3 hours ago, Adam Farquharson said:

Is it possible to get an E-mails sent out to all of the Gatwick endorsed ground controllers letting them know the new routings and new holding points because a lot of the controllers won't be active on this part of the forum and might not see that there is a change.

I don't think they can now due to GDPR, however, you could just learn them yourself and look at the photo @George Peppard attached above.

Northern and Easterly departures go to A3/J4 

Southerly and Westerly departures go to A2/J7

Share this post


Link to post
Adam Farquharson

yeah it is fine for me but I know when I first started controlling I didn't look at the forums meaning that I wouldn't have known there was a change and I wouldn't have known that there was a change. It hasn't really changed because anything going to SAM is still A2/J7 as before but it would more be the routings that I wouldn't know meaning you would end up with broken flight plans with missing airway's. I guess London South/Gatwick director will just have to put up with some dodgy flight plans.

Share this post


Link to post
Nathan Innes
12 hours ago, Adam Farquharson said:

Is it possible to get an E-mails sent out to all of the Gatwick endorsed ground controllers letting them know the new routings and new holding points because a lot of the controllers won't be active on this part of the forum and might not see that there is a change.

It's the controllers responsibility at the end of the day to ensure that what they have is up to date with the new AIRAC cycles.

Share this post


Link to post
Alex Ridge

Hello,

Sorry to bump this but I feel like an update is needed.

 

Alex

Share this post


Link to post
Louie Lister
56 minutes ago, Alex Ridge said:

Hello,

Sorry to bump this but I feel like an update is needed.

 

Alex

I believe it is currently in progress.
Patience is a virtue.. 

Share this post


Link to post
George Peppard

If it's not already a WIP as @Louie Lister has said...

These things take time. You could perhaps offer to volunteer to help update the documentation?

Share this post


Link to post
Alex Ridge
11 hours ago, George Peppard said:

If it's not already a WIP as @Louie Lister has said...

These things take time. You could perhaps offer to volunteer to help update the documentation?

With all due respect, the responsibility shouldn't be passed over to membership flippantly like that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Louie Lister
7 minutes ago, Alex Ridge said:

With all due respect, the responsibility shouldn't be passed over to membership flippantly like that. 

These are only comments that staff would have said anyway and are not 'responsibilities' for the membership. George and I are just simply stating facts. With all due respect to you Alex, the current crib sheet is fairly up-to-date anyway and there is not a lot to change except the new 2 departures which replace SAM. I doubt this is the highest priority for ATC and OPS. 

Share this post


Link to post
Lewis Corcoran
5 minutes ago, Louie Lister said:

These are only comments that staff would have said anyway and are not 'responsibilities' for the membership. George and I are just simply stating facts. With all due respect to you Alex, the current crib sheet is fairly up-to-date anyway and there is not a lot to change except the new 2 departures which replace SAM. I doubt this is the highest priority for ATC and OPS. 

Yeah, that's the only change I believe so I mean you could edit it yourself. Or make a custom one for personal use before they make a public one

Share this post


Link to post
George Peppard
26 minutes ago, Alex Ridge said:

the responsibility shouldn't be passed over to membership flippantly like that

With all due respect I heavily disagree. ATC training: volunteers. Pilot training: volunteers. Operations: volunteers.

VATSIM runs off volunteers. If nobody volunteered to do anything then nothing would be done.

Nobody is getting paid to do any of this. We don’t have an SLA with the operations department, we don’t have any sort of contract with them nor can we force them to update a crib sheet with a few low priority changes.

The crib sheet is there to help the controller - not as a final reference to everything. Learn the local procedures and you’ll be fine.

Edited by George Peppard

Share this post


Link to post
Louie Lister
3 minutes ago, George Peppard said:

With all due respect I heavily disagree. ATC training: volunteers. Pilot training: volunteers. Operations: volunteers.

VATSIM rubs off volunteers. If nobody volunteered to do anything then nothing would be done.

Nobody is getting paid to do any of this. We don’t have an SLA with the operations department, we don’t have any sort of contract with them nor can we force them to update a crib sheet with a few low priority changes.

The crib sheet is there to help the controller - not as a final reference to everything. Learn the local procedures and you’ll be fine.

I have to agree with you George. To be honest Alex, it's the membership who contributed to the sector file you control on, the VMATs you read and also the Crib Sheets you read. It's not always just staff, for example I'm currently in the progress of building a Crib Sheet for Southend. I wouldn't rely on staff members to reply when it's also non-staff contributing too.

Edited by Louie Lister

Share this post


Link to post
Richard Keen

The end of the day it will be ready when its ready , the people who make these crib sheets more then likely have other RW commitments so get round to finishing  them when they can....you could always spend time learning the airport you control at by memory so no need to use the Crib sheets ,you know some of the SIDs have changed so learn the new SIDs and which ones they replaced and take it into account when sending flights to the holds   ... more fun that way.

Rich

Share this post


Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Similar Content

    • Magnus Meese
      By Magnus Meese
      Please don't leave the oceanic guide as a PDF in the file library. When you're on EGGX and must help a pilot figure out what the hell this oceanic magic is, a quick and easy link with no hurdles other than reading the guide itself reduces the odds of the pilot's head imploding with the result of radio silence or disconnects. Don't underestimate the impact of navigating a few subfolders in a file library when you're already feeling dumb and stressed, as opposed to recieving the direct link to a web page which has all you need.
       
      PS, semi related: I can understand the logic behind using the home page like a profile page, but I still prefer a traditional home page with relevant news, events, online controllers, quick links, etc. A stats page (or if not logged in, a JOIN US! page) has its use, but I believe the top menu bar should be the go-to for full site navigation, not the first instance for the most common and usefull site usages. Again, I think this is directly linked to the odds of new members spending five seconds looking at the Area Sectorisation map and other useful things. Other than these two pet peeves, the VatUK website has become really one of the best built sites on the network in terms of look, function and content.
    • Harry Sugden
      By Harry Sugden
      Was scrolling through vHansard, and came across this! Looks like we missed the memo? Ah well, looks like a pretty cool format for temporary notices, so maybe next time.

      (p.s. this is not a criticism!!..... i just wanted to write something in the house of commons font)
    • Ryan Boulton-Lear
      By Ryan Boulton-Lear
      Hello all ! Not wishing to open a can of worms here, but hoping for a bit of clarification regarding the booking of Manchester tower. Now there is obviously two towers "EGCC_N_TWR" and "EGCC_S_TWR" and it's always been a gentlemen's agreement so to speak from North Tower whether they wan't South tower open or not, so it's not really booked. Now I accidentally booked on the CTS "EGCC_TWR" which it let me do, and then another controller booked "EGCC_N_TWR" which it also let them do which overlapped the bookings then. So looking for clarification really on what you should be booking Manchester Tower under. However if there is no official rule my proposal would be:
      If someone books "EGCC_TWR" they are band boxing both towers, but if someone wishes to open EGCC_S_TWR they still ask EGCC_N_TWR if that's okay.
      If someone books "EGCC_N_TWR" then another controller can book "EGCC_S_TWR" and the controllers do duals for the time that South Tower is logged on with their bookings. 
       
      I look forward to any responses and hopefully we can get some clarification on this for the future !
       
      Kind Regards,
       
      Ryan Boulton - Lear
    • Simon Conway
      By Simon Conway
      Hi,
      It seems the smartCARS is windows only (an .exe file) which alienates mac users.
      Is it possible to supply all the necessary server details so if for example I were to use Xplane and a Mac (yes, I know!, a double whammy!!) I could use the existing XACARS application and enjoy the new (is it new?) training excercises? 🙂
      Thanks in advance,
      Simon.
    • Callum McLoughlin
      By Callum McLoughlin
      Hi all, can I challenge why both the head of training and manager responsible for ATC training both have a potential of holding S3 ratings? Why is it judged as appropriate for the vacancy for head of ATC training to also have a minimum of an S3 too?
      My question arises as the S stands for "student".
      Open minded, but would be interested in the justification/thought process behind this.
      Have a good weekend 🙂 
×
×
  • Create New...