Jump to content
Jamie Paine

discussion Splitting of Sections In APP Reports

Recommended Posts

Jamie Paine

 

 

Edited by Jamie Paine

Share this post


Link to post
Connor Faulder

I don't mind if stuff is recategorised but please don't split the APP reports any more than they already are. They're big enough already!

Edited by Connor Faulder

Share this post


Link to post
Jamie Paine
1 hour ago, Connor Faulder said:

I don't mind if stuff is recategorised but please don't split the APP reports any more than they already are. They're big enough already!

I agree with you Connor, but I believe the reports need to be lengthy as the S2-S3 course is extremely intensive and the splitting of a specific area will aid student progress so they can better visualise areas that they need to self-revise.

Share this post


Link to post
Andy Ford

Hi Jamie,

Whilst I can't give an exact timeframe, I know that revisiting criteria is on the todo list :)

Share this post


Link to post
Jamie Paine
Just now, Andy Ford said:

Hi Jamie,

Whilst I can't give an exact timeframe, I know that revisiting criteria is on the todo list :)

Excellent!:D

 

Share this post


Link to post
Nathan Donnelly

Strictly from a mentor perspective, I feel that the S2-S3 reports are too long and have been known to put people off mentoring, in the past.
I agree that it isn't ideal having four important topics covered by the same grade but moving forward, I don't think Sam is looking to make the reports any longer; quite the opposite in fact.

One for @Samuel James and @Alex Beard.

Share this post


Link to post
Michael Pike

When the S3 Moodle course is done and students start coming through that, hopefully the 'knowledge' section of the reports can disappear altogether. Any lack of knowledge will come to light and be discussed in the practical situations that arise. So for example perhaps the most important topic would be 'ensuring separation'. If a student fails to do that, the discussion will include what the basic requirement for separation is in that situation and why it wasn't applied (lack of experience usually not lack of knowledge).

I don't think I've viewed the existing reports as a syllabus that has to be taught subject by subject. There is already a requirement for students to prepare themselves to some extent. I see the headings in the report as a convenient breakdown under which to make comments about shortcomings, and achievements rather than a step-by-step teaching guide.

Of course, opinions differ and mentoring methods vary greatly between mentors, and quite rightly between students with the same mentor. I've opened up the topic quite a bit there but maybe the approach types knowledge section could usefully be split out in the short term. I can see the logic in that.

Share this post


Link to post
Samuel James

Thanks Jamie and others for raising your concerns. As @Nathan Donnelly and @Andy Ford have both correctly mentioned I am very keen to slim down the size of our mentoring reports. I want to make mentoring our students an enjoyable and rewarding experience and spending 30 mins filing a session report is not my kind of fun I assure you. The ATC TD has this on our hit list and the session progress sheets will be revised alongside some new changes to the way we grade students too. I'll do my best to get these changes actioned alongside the release of S2/S3 CT which @Michael Pike has highlighted will hopefully help to improve students' general overall knowledge to begin with.

Share this post


Link to post
Jamie Paine
58 minutes ago, Samuel James said:

Thanks Jamie and others for raising your concerns. As @Nathan Donnelly and @Andy Ford have both correctly mentioned I am very keen to slim down the size of our mentoring reports. I want to make mentoring our students an enjoyable and rewarding experience and spending 30 mins filing a session report is not my kind of fun I assure you. The ATC TD has this on our hit list and the session progress sheets will be revised alongside some new changes to the way we grade students too. I'll do my best to get these changes actioned alongside the release of S2/S3 CT which @Michael Pike has highlighted will hopefully help to improve students' general overall knowledge to begin with.

Yeah I must admit those reports are a pain:P

Share this post


Link to post

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • Yakov Dlougach
      By Yakov Dlougach
      Real-world EGLL AIP does not explicitly prohibit fixed-wing VFR traffic:
       However here on VATSIM VFR in the Inner zone is only allowed for helicopters. Any reasons for that?
    • Stuart Duncan
      By Stuart Duncan
      Morning!
      Everyone knows internet forums were invented by the Romans in the year 23BC.  Fast forward a couple of millenia and we're still using them to this day; or are we?
      Back in the day, we used to sign on to www.vatsim-uk.org/forums which through domain changes, a community emphesis and the like became what we know and love today - community.vatsim.uk.
      I'm aware the Division uses slack and have done so for quite some time.  However, I'm notincing of late more and more emphasis on and reliance of the use of Slack.
      I believe this is to the detriment of the esprit de corps of the community. Firstly, I, and many others don't use Slack, so the potential exists for information and discussion to be missed.  Secondly, I get the impression that the balance of community discussion is shifting towards Slack, leaving this very forum less active with less content and potential delegation to the position of Slack's poorer cousin.  Like I say, I'm not on Slack so potentially my impression could be wide of the mark.
      I guess what I'm saying is please can we look at the possibility of promoting the forum as the 1st port of call for community discussion and leave Slack as more of project management/task allocation platform?
      Cheers,
      S.
    • Richard Keen
      By Richard Keen
      Hi all
       
      Just like to say well done to all the controllers tonight for another fantastic Mid Week Gatwick event, really enjoyed the short flight from EGHQ .... although I did scare the TMA controller who thought I was holding wrong when infact the Aerosoft A330 flew it correctly which was  parallel entry into the hold. They must have improved the Holds in the latest patch lol ....can't wait till the next event.
      Thanks again all roll on the next one
      Rich

    • Joe Dobson
      By Joe Dobson
      Posting this as I can't use the feedback form (requires individual CID and the controllers are all offline now).
       
      Thanks for a great event. Special thanks to EGPH and EGCC controllers, MAN and Scottish Control North of Edinburgh. Bounced around EGCC, EGPH and EGPE in a KA350 and it was very good fun.
    • Alex Hodgkinson
      By Alex Hodgkinson
      Morning.
      Would it be possible for individual members to see all their feedback that has been written against them? Both positive and negative? 
      Reason? I believe there is a significant amount of feedback that’s not being seen by the membership probably because no-doubt each piece of feedback needs individually actioning by an individual to then be seen by the member to which it relates. If we could review our own feedback then surely we can take it upon ourselves to improve?
      I understand there will be some people who won’t want to see their negative feedback so perhaps an opt-out feature could be installed where the member won’t automatically be able to see their feedback unless it was given to them by the vatsim uk team? (As is the current process now aiui) 
      TYKR. 
       
×
×
  • Create New...