Jump to content
Trevor Hannant

atc-discussion Planned Military Controlling

Recommended Posts

Trevor Hannant

If you are Military validated and have a spare hour or two, feel free to jump on a position and post the details here.  You never know you might just get traffic!

Please use the following standard format for each planned controlling session:


Time: (preferably local AND zulu times, if different!)

ATC Position:


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Neil Ryans

Hi Trevor

Neil Ryans here, as a visiting controller with MIL TWR endorsement, I enjoy controlling at the MIL aerodromes, I have been on at Yeovilton, Valley and Warton (Generally during CIX VFR club events)

I'll be happy to post here next time I plan a session,  what airport would the VRAF pilots prefer ?  and I will try and oblige





Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Trevor Hannant

Hi Neil.

The most common airfields that vRAF use are Brize, Coningsby and Lossiemouth although at the moment most have been abroad for a bit on a couple of different exercises so it's been a bit quiet here of late...  Once they come back from the VATSIM-wide VATMILEX that's ongoing just now, I think they're planning some local stuff to get activity up here again.  I'll make sure they post up what they need so we can get some cover on...


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sebastian Wheeler

Date: 11/05/18

Time: 1800-2100Z/1900-2000L (approx.)

ATC Position: EGVO_TWR (Odiham Tower)

Comments: Thought I might open some mil stuff more often, any adjacent control from APC/Swanwick Mil would be good, and anyone in a Chinook, Merlin, or other mil stuff will be greatly appreciated! (Just thought i'd pull up a mil control thread as well!)

Edited by Sebastian Wheeler

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • Sebastian Wheeler
      By Sebastian Wheeler
      Just a slight query related to the above:
      I was fortunate enough to partake in a weeks worth of work experience with NATS recently, and while at whitely on the ADC sims, I heard the following phraseology being used "G-ABCD, Cleared to enter controlled airspace via Route A, at or below altitude 2000 feet, QNH 1014."
      Upon asking one of the pseudo-pilots about the change, I was told it is "new phraseology" can anyone else confirm whether this is the case? Apparently, it was put in place after some confusion from pilots after receiving a "not above" clearance.
    • Steve Riley
      By Steve Riley
      Just reading the new sid charts , am I right in saying hand offs are going to LONDON or SCOTTISH  and not radar as no mention of Radar on the charts.
      2. After departure, aircraft shall remain on the Tower frequency until instructed. 3. En-route cruising levels will be issued after take-off by 'London Control'. 4. Report callsign, SID designator, current altitude and cleared level on first contact with 'London Control'.
      I have not got the old charts to confirm this as I take them straight from NATS web site. 
      Also frequencies have changed are we changing them within ES ?
        123.980, 131.005  BIRMINGHAM APPROACH/RADAR
        118.305  BIRMINGHAM TOWER
      121.805  BIRMINGHAM GROUND 

    • Thomas Wowk
      By Thomas Wowk
      As above, how do you guys assess the runway surface condition on VATSIM? Do you make a visual assessment from the visual control room in correlation to the current/prevailing weather conditions or do you assess this purely off the METAR/TAF?
      The only reason i ask it that the surface condition of a runway really affects our landing performance (each operators SOP's may be different for the same aircraft type) Specifically if the runway is declared as DRY full length our crosswind limitations may be increased, whereas if the runway is declared WET full length, crosswind limitations are decreased. If i also needed to return after departure due to an emergency and perform an overweight landing, a DRY/WET surface also makes quite a difference for our overall LDA requirements. 
    • Thomas Wowk
      By Thomas Wowk
      Hi all,
      For the ones who enjoy carrying out IFR circuits in large aircraft, Doncaster Sheffield (EGCN) accepts visual circuits for aircraft above 5,700kg - B737/B757/B767/B747 etc. 
      The circuit profile & procedure can be found in the textual data in the AIP for EGCN. Primarily speaking only one aircraft can be in the circuit at a time. Be nice to get TWR on at EGCN from time to time to accept more training traffic within the network.
      The circuit profile briefly summarised as below:
      Visual circuits by aircraft above 5700 kg must comply with the following noise abatement procedures.
      i. Runway 02 After departure turn right crosswind at no greater than 2.5 DME, fly downwind at 2000 FT QNH, report final south of Bawtry (3 DME) and not below 1500 FT QNH.
      ii. Runway 20 After departure climb on track 190°, at 1.5 DME turn left crosswind, fly downwind at 2000 FT QNH and report final not below 1500 FT QNH
    • Chris Pawley
      By Chris Pawley
      The Letter of Agreement between London and Amsterdam (Dutch vACC) is revised to take into account changes in AD3 at the end of 2018. It's available here.
  • Create New...