Jump to content
Alec Walker

atc-discussion Use of CPDLC

Recommended Posts

Alec Walker

Hi All,

In general for Shanwick, and with CTP looming large, I would like to put forward a case for CPDLC.

I feel it is an often underused piece of equipment, especially if realism is your key. I have been using CPDLC where possible and I have found that although the majority of members know nothing about it, those that do love it and those that find out about it from me try it and like it. Historically, it has been a pain to use alongside Euroscope as it's been a separate program but I've been having a tinker with the Australian TAAATS mod and have got this working with Euroscope and the Shanwick sector file.

They key points for me with the TAAATS mod are CPDLC from directly within Euroscope and a use of ADS-C tracking fed directly into Euroscope. Again, this is an excellent realism tool, and I feel that if we offer it, people will start to use it more.

That being said, would people be interested in utilising my setup for TAAATS/SAATS? I have made some changes to the tags and screens, as those aircraft in the SAATS screen are way to big for my liking. I am also hoping that we can have an updated version of GOATS available soon as the developer has released the source code and Craig Phillips has agreed to assist in updating it. These two tools together make for an excellent representation of the Shanwick system!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Simon Kelsey

Alec,

It's a great idea in principle -- I think the big barrier to widespread uptake on the pilot side is the fact that Hoppie's ACARS client doesn't integrate that well with MSFS (or, perhaps I'm doing it wrong). At present the pilot has to install a separate piece of software which runs externally from MSFS and having, for instance, programmed up the FMC in the aircraft the pilot is then required to input all the same essential information in to the ACARS CDU and keep updating it as the flight progresses. It's all a bit of a faff.

However: if there is/can be widespread support for the Hoppie protocol (for want of a better term) across the ATC community then perhaps gradually there will be more of a demand from pilots for third-party aircraft developers to integrate it in to their models. At present, the argument from Aerosoft in particular is that they are waiting for the networks to develop their own ACARS protocols and once they are in place they will support them: I suppose if it can be decided/proven that the ACARS protocol of choice on VATSIM is the Hoppie system then they might be prepared to support it (and others may follow suit) but it's something which would require network-wide support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Harry Sugden

Hi Alec,

If you're able to guide me through exactly what likes to be done (I'm generally best reading guides / being shown that just guessing! :D), then sure, I'd happily facilitate the use of CPDLC for any Oceanic controlling slots I am doing on Saturday.

Seeing GOATS in use I'm sure would please many - at the moment I believe we don't use it because the integration between controllers isn't tested to its extreme, widely recognised as standard practice... and change (which many don't like)! If some real development can be invested into it, then that would be another great asset to busy Oceanic positions, as I certainly enjoy using it when solo.

Edited by Harry Sugden

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bill Casey

Alec,

It's a great idea in principle -- I think the big barrier to widespread uptake on the pilot side is the fact that Hoppie's ACARS client doesn't integrate that well with MSFS (or, perhaps I'm doing it wrong). At present the pilot has to install a separate piece of software which runs externally from MSFS and having, for instance, programmed up the FMC in the aircraft the pilot is then required to input all the same essential information in to the ACARS CDU and keep updating it as the flight progresses. It's all a bit of a faff.

Extra work in order to fly on text? No thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alec Walker

Hi Harry,

I'm off work all week now, so let me know when you want, and I can set up a Teamviewer session and take you through it if you wish!

I will also try and put a guide together for general use as well!

And Mr Casey, your signature says it all! :P

Cheers,

Alec

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • Kieran Samuel Cross
      By Kieran Samuel Cross
      --PLS DELETE--
    • James Taylor
      By James Taylor
      Hi,
      Does anyone know where I can get the actual client for Audio For Vatsim that runs alongside Euroscope?
      Thanks in advance,
      Regards
      James
    • Edward Berkley
      By Edward Berkley
      Hello all,
      I was finding a more realistic way to give out PDC's via text. I thought of using these two messages:
      .pdc1 .msg $aircraft $dep PDC: $aircraft CLRD TO $arr $deprwy via $sid INIT ALT: $alt squawk $asquawk ATIS $atiscode NO READBACK REQUIRED. If you're happy with this PDC, please verify by replying to this message, saying: "ACCEPT".
       
      If they reply with 'accept' then I send out this second message.

      .pdc2 .msg $aircraft Thank you, $aircraft. Contact $callsign on frequency $com when FULLY ready to push and start with stand number, ATIS info, aircraft type AND current QNH
      I preferably wanted all of the important information from the second message into the first message. However, I discover that euroscope has a word limit as to how long your messages can be.
      I'm wondering what you guys think of this procedure. Are vatsim pilots very responsive? As well, is there a way to automatically send out the second message by a somewhat means of detection from the pilot when he/she says 'accept'?
      I hope what I just said makes sense. 
       
      Many thanks!
       
       
    • Paul Dean
      By Paul Dean
      Can anyone suggest an atis frequency for Marham?
      Cheers
    • Trevor Gibson
      By Trevor Gibson
      Just wondering now that I have my S1 at some point after I operated at EGCC GND would it be possible to control EGAA. How would I go about getting that sector or is Belfast not available 
×
×
  • Create New...