Jump to content
Ross Robertson

atc-discussion Clarification of controller priority

Recommended Posts

Ross Robertson

Hi,

 

I am currently not far from doing my skills test for my PPL in the real world and found out about vatsim. I am still trying to get my head around the priority order for controllers. 

 

I have been reading the online documentation to get an understanding of the order of priority in the event that the controller I am looking for is not online. This seems easy enough for example if I was looking for a departure and the ground controller was not available then I would try the tower, approach centre or FIR.

 

"Start with the Clearance Delivery controller for your location and tune to their frequency. You would request clearance there. If that position is not staffed for the departure airport (xxx), look for ATC staffing in this order: "

Clearance Delivery (xxx_DEL)
Ground (xxx_GND)
Tower (xxx_TWR)
Approach (xxx_APP)
Center (xxx_CTR) 

 

"If there is no ATC available from the Centre or FIR you are departing, you are considered to be operating in a Unicom environment. A clearance is not required. In that event, tune to 122.80 (the advisory frequency or “Unicom”)"

 

The above seems fine but I was planning on doing a simple route from EGPJ to EGPG and go through the Edinburgh zone today. I would in real life contact approach and ask for a zone transit.

 

Question 1 -
What do I do if no one else above the approach controller is available? It so happens that a ground controller is on at Edinburgh. Should I contact them and ask for a zone transit or do a unicom message to say that I am entering the zone routing say kelty, forth road bridge, Polmont, Cumernauld? Would I do the same if for example the tower controller and not the ground controller?

 

Question 2-
If I am flying to a controlled airport such as Edinburgh and for example and the only controller available is the EGPX (FIR) controller. Do I just make a normal request of "tayside1 request join instructions for EGPH" and the FIR controller then takes on the responsibility of the approach controller.

 

Sorry if this question has been asked before but I wanted to get this clear in my head before I embark upon the virtual flying world.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Regards,

 

Ross

fly.docx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lewis Hardcastle

Hello Ross

 

Question 1

 

In that scenario you wouldn't need to contact the ground controller because they only cover the taxiways and apron area. If there was a tower online then you would contact them for zone entry or transits etc. 

 

Question 2

 

Yes they cover the whole of Scottish airspace and if you're departing an airport that is within controlled airspace then you would need to call them up. 

We have this diagram on the VATUK website that explains the coverage more - http://www.vatsim-uk.co.uk/area-sectors/

 

If in doubt then you can always PM the controller to check what they cover.

Edited by Lewis Hardcastle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oliver Rhodes

Hi Ross,

 

First of all, welcome to the world of VATSIM!

 

In answer to your questions:

 

1. Ground controllers are responsible for the operations of the airport taxiways and stands (not including the runway), they aren't responsible for any airspace. Therefore, in your scenario, you would broadcast on UNICOM your intentions.

 

2. Yes, the FIR controller would operate the job of approach, tower, ground, and delivery. In my experience, the level of service required depends on their traffic levels. In high traffic situations, they may tell you to taxi at your own discretion.

 

Also, on VATSIM we operate a 'top-down' control system. This means that any controller will operate any position below them, unless that position is staffed. However, stations such as Eurocontrol will not operate below a certain altitude (I believe that it is FL240). 

 

Hopefully this helps you with your questions.

 

Happy Flying!

 

Oliver Rhodes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
William Grimsley

Also, on VATSIM we operate a 'top-down' control system. This means that any controller will operate any position below them, unless that position is staffed. However, stations such as Eurocontrol will not operate below a certain altitude (I believe that it is FL240). 

I think this level is FL245. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oliver Rhodes

Yes, that is correct - EuroControl covers upper airspace only, above Flight Level 245.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • Kilian Thornton
      By Kilian Thornton
      Hi,
      I was wondering if we could reconsider the callsign allocated to the Scottish Sector covering the Strangford CTA and resultantly the Belfast TMA. This callsign is slightly frustrating when logged on as it does not show up on any of the VATSIM online viewers such as VATspy, Vroute, VATASTIC etc. and therefore is difficult to attract any sort of traffic when there is just the Belfast ATIS logged on. There is not much point of logging onto the position other than to surprise pilots going into AA/AC that there is actually ATC on. 
      Is this something we could revisit?
    • Arvid Hansson
      By Arvid Hansson
      To all controllers rostered on LTC/AC positions for the event tomorrow, here is a short briefing post with some key points all controllers should take into account:
      Any changes in availability must be reported as soon as possible to myself or Harry. Weaving together the roster with our current headcount has been somewhat of a challenge and we don't want any last minute surprises! Contrary to the post in the roster thread, there will not be an organised brief tomorrow afternoon. Any updates/further information will be communicated via this thread. Any questions can also be put here or directed to me or Harry directly. Stansted and Gatwick have been designated as the North/South diversion airports. If pilots indicate they're running out of fuel or they're holding past their bedtime, direct them to the nearest of these two airports straight away. No faffing about. Avoid holding aircraft at BRASO unless the BIG stack is or becoming full. It is more efficient to stack swap these aircraft to BIG. The same concept could potentially apply at WCO vs. OCK etc. but the LAM stream will be busier than the rest of the streams by far. Be proactive. Do not accept more planes if your sector is becoming too saturated. Do not blindly accept handoffs without knowing whether the aircraft will fit in your sector. Speak to your feeding sector and have them hold planes if necessary to avoid your own sector becoming a mess. This applies especially to the Clacton and TC East sectors, but all sectors with dense streams must make sure to stream aircraft at reasonable speeds. Don't have your stream at 280kts until reaching the stack. Reconsider all speed restrictions above 250kts when entering TCN/TCS sectors. It is imperative that pilots are able to reach holding speed in a timely manner for the holding to be efficient and consistent. Make sure pilots understand holding speed, do not be afraid to reiterate the speed in knots if they seem to not be fully understanding what they should do. Ask for lower speeds from your feeder if you are being offered planes that are too fast. It is OK and perfectly acceptable, but more importantly safe for departures to stay at 6,000ft for a while. Do not rush their climbs if it will cause unnecessary conflicts. Reiterate the 6,000ft restriction to pilots who sound like they need a refresher, and kindly advise pilots urging you for higher that it is not necessary. Speak to your neighbours! If we have EHAA/LFxx coverage, make sure they are away of how busy we are. Have them put planes on low mach numbers early, introduce MDIs at AMS, CDG, and other nearby airports if absolutely necessary and make sure they stay on top of their streaming game. If they don't, communicate and tell them what you need! Requesting 10-20 miles in trail if required is not unreasonable, and they should be able to accommodate. If we don't end up lucky enough to have neighbouring coverage, don't be afraid to take planes early if you have the capacity. Getting speed control sorted early or even holding planes outside the FIR if required will be a massive help. Use your breaks wisely. Drink water (or a beverage of your choice( @Lewis Hardcastle)) to stay alert and hydrated. Now, some "technical" things:
      Make sure you have the latest sector file (2019/01). I won't link to it here. If you don't know where to find it, kindly withdraw your name from the roster 😉 If you can, please update your Euroscope NavData to cycle 1901. This will ensure you have all new fixes, airways etc. which have been added recently. If you are not sure how to do this, speak to myself, Harry or someone who you think might know for assistance. Take a good look at the roster, make sure you understand and can picture the different splits - especially the LTC splits. Some sectors will consolidate onto TC bandbox, and some onto their parent sector which might look confusing if you don't see the big picture (sometimes they'll just close, though 🙂 ). Add this to your alias file. It includes all holding instructions we will realistically need and will save valuable RT time when pilots don't have the charts up. Do NOT spend unnecessary time trying to verbally give holding instructions more than once. If you need to repeat it, send the alias and be over with it. If you are interested, here are the predicted arrival frequencies from each stack over 30 minute intervals throughout the event (times shown are wheels down times):

      That was all for now. Don't forget that we are here to have fun, let's have a blast tomorrow! 😄
      @Phillip Speer @Callum Axon @Chris Pawley @Fraser Cooper @Matthew Burton @Sebastian Rekdal  @Lewis Hardcastle @Luke Collister @Dale Brooksby @Luke Brown
    • Harry Sugden
      By Harry Sugden
      Hi all,
      If there are any more C1s around to control for Real Ops, your help would be very much appreciated! Coverage on North and West (if we manage to get enough people) will help too - either book in the CTS or pop your name down on the post and we could roster some cover there.
      The more we can split, the more fun it'll hopefully be... at the moment it's just looking like unmanageable stress!
      Cheers
    • Callum McLoughlin
      By Callum McLoughlin
      I have booked LL INTN tomorrow evening between 5-10pm. If anybody would like to join in, perhaps even take FIN and S_APP, you'd be very welcome to. Perhaps it could be a little practice for the overload? I'm happy to swap around too if someone wants a go on N_APP.
      The offer is there, anyway 🙂 
×