Jump to content
Ross Robertson

atc-discussion Clarification of controller priority

Recommended Posts

Ross Robertson

Hi,

 

I am currently not far from doing my skills test for my PPL in the real world and found out about vatsim. I am still trying to get my head around the priority order for controllers. 

 

I have been reading the online documentation to get an understanding of the order of priority in the event that the controller I am looking for is not online. This seems easy enough for example if I was looking for a departure and the ground controller was not available then I would try the tower, approach centre or FIR.

 

"Start with the Clearance Delivery controller for your location and tune to their frequency. You would request clearance there. If that position is not staffed for the departure airport (xxx), look for ATC staffing in this order: "

Clearance Delivery (xxx_DEL)
Ground (xxx_GND)
Tower (xxx_TWR)
Approach (xxx_APP)
Center (xxx_CTR) 

 

"If there is no ATC available from the Centre or FIR you are departing, you are considered to be operating in a Unicom environment. A clearance is not required. In that event, tune to 122.80 (the advisory frequency or “Unicom”)"

 

The above seems fine but I was planning on doing a simple route from EGPJ to EGPG and go through the Edinburgh zone today. I would in real life contact approach and ask for a zone transit.

 

Question 1 -
What do I do if no one else above the approach controller is available? It so happens that a ground controller is on at Edinburgh. Should I contact them and ask for a zone transit or do a unicom message to say that I am entering the zone routing say kelty, forth road bridge, Polmont, Cumernauld? Would I do the same if for example the tower controller and not the ground controller?

 

Question 2-
If I am flying to a controlled airport such as Edinburgh and for example and the only controller available is the EGPX (FIR) controller. Do I just make a normal request of "tayside1 request join instructions for EGPH" and the FIR controller then takes on the responsibility of the approach controller.

 

Sorry if this question has been asked before but I wanted to get this clear in my head before I embark upon the virtual flying world.

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Regards,

 

Ross

fly.docx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lewis Hardcastle

Hello Ross

 

Question 1

 

In that scenario you wouldn't need to contact the ground controller because they only cover the taxiways and apron area. If there was a tower online then you would contact them for zone entry or transits etc. 

 

Question 2

 

Yes they cover the whole of Scottish airspace and if you're departing an airport that is within controlled airspace then you would need to call them up. 

We have this diagram on the VATUK website that explains the coverage more - http://www.vatsim-uk.co.uk/area-sectors/

 

If in doubt then you can always PM the controller to check what they cover.

Edited by Lewis Hardcastle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oliver Rhodes

Hi Ross,

 

First of all, welcome to the world of VATSIM!

 

In answer to your questions:

 

1. Ground controllers are responsible for the operations of the airport taxiways and stands (not including the runway), they aren't responsible for any airspace. Therefore, in your scenario, you would broadcast on UNICOM your intentions.

 

2. Yes, the FIR controller would operate the job of approach, tower, ground, and delivery. In my experience, the level of service required depends on their traffic levels. In high traffic situations, they may tell you to taxi at your own discretion.

 

Also, on VATSIM we operate a 'top-down' control system. This means that any controller will operate any position below them, unless that position is staffed. However, stations such as Eurocontrol will not operate below a certain altitude (I believe that it is FL240). 

 

Hopefully this helps you with your questions.

 

Happy Flying!

 

Oliver Rhodes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
William Grimsley

Also, on VATSIM we operate a 'top-down' control system. This means that any controller will operate any position below them, unless that position is staffed. However, stations such as Eurocontrol will not operate below a certain altitude (I believe that it is FL240). 

I think this level is FL245. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oliver Rhodes

Yes, that is correct - EuroControl covers upper airspace only, above Flight Level 245.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • Sebastian Wheeler
      By Sebastian Wheeler
      Just a slight query related to the above:
      I was fortunate enough to partake in a weeks worth of work experience with NATS recently, and while at whitely on the ADC sims, I heard the following phraseology being used "G-ABCD, Cleared to enter controlled airspace via Route A, at or below altitude 2000 feet, QNH 1014."
      Upon asking one of the pseudo-pilots about the change, I was told it is "new phraseology" can anyone else confirm whether this is the case? Apparently, it was put in place after some confusion from pilots after receiving a "not above" clearance.
    • Steve Riley
      By Steve Riley
      Just reading the new sid charts , am I right in saying hand offs are going to LONDON or SCOTTISH  and not radar as no mention of Radar on the charts.
      2. After departure, aircraft shall remain on the Tower frequency until instructed. 3. En-route cruising levels will be issued after take-off by 'London Control'. 4. Report callsign, SID designator, current altitude and cleared level on first contact with 'London Control'.
      I have not got the old charts to confirm this as I take them straight from NATS web site. 
      Also frequencies have changed are we changing them within ES ?
        123.980, 131.005  BIRMINGHAM APPROACH/RADAR
        118.305  BIRMINGHAM TOWER
      121.805  BIRMINGHAM GROUND 
       

       
       
    • Thomas Wowk
      By Thomas Wowk
      As above, how do you guys assess the runway surface condition on VATSIM? Do you make a visual assessment from the visual control room in correlation to the current/prevailing weather conditions or do you assess this purely off the METAR/TAF?
       
      The only reason i ask it that the surface condition of a runway really affects our landing performance (each operators SOP's may be different for the same aircraft type) Specifically if the runway is declared as DRY full length our crosswind limitations may be increased, whereas if the runway is declared WET full length, crosswind limitations are decreased. If i also needed to return after departure due to an emergency and perform an overweight landing, a DRY/WET surface also makes quite a difference for our overall LDA requirements. 
       
      Cheers
    • Thomas Wowk
      By Thomas Wowk
      Hi all,
       
      For the ones who enjoy carrying out IFR circuits in large aircraft, Doncaster Sheffield (EGCN) accepts visual circuits for aircraft above 5,700kg - B737/B757/B767/B747 etc. 
       
      The circuit profile & procedure can be found in the textual data in the AIP for EGCN. Primarily speaking only one aircraft can be in the circuit at a time. Be nice to get TWR on at EGCN from time to time to accept more training traffic within the network.
       
      The circuit profile briefly summarised as below:
       
      Visual circuits by aircraft above 5700 kg must comply with the following noise abatement procedures.
       
      i. Runway 02 After departure turn right crosswind at no greater than 2.5 DME, fly downwind at 2000 FT QNH, report final south of Bawtry (3 DME) and not below 1500 FT QNH.
      ii. Runway 20 After departure climb on track 190°, at 1.5 DME turn left crosswind, fly downwind at 2000 FT QNH and report final not below 1500 FT QNH
       
      Cheers.
       
       
    • Chris Pawley
      By Chris Pawley
      The Letter of Agreement between London and Amsterdam (Dutch vACC) is revised to take into account changes in AD3 at the end of 2018. It's available here.
       
      Chris.
×
×
  • Create New...