Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Simon Irvine

atc-discussion Oceanic Control document

Recommended Posts

Simon Irvine

I am delighted to announce the publication of our Oceanic Control document.


I would like to thank Kieran Hardern for the time he has spent putting this invaluable document together.  


Kieran would like to thank George Wright, Jamie Fox, Barrie Joplin and Chris Pawley for their extensive proof reading, corrections and suggestions. 
Also thanks to Martin Bergin and Jean-Francois Desrosiers for their input regarding procedures and content.
The document can be found here.
I hope that you find it useful.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Matthew Weddell

Is there still a requirement to pass Mach number in a position report? The last few trips I've done didn't involve a single one.

I'm presuming now because all the separation is time based rather than speed based, therefore there is no requirement to pass it.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Anders Moen

According to the examples in NAT 007, Mach numbers are not included in position reports :)


From the document:

“Position, Swissair 100, on 8831, RESNO at 1235, Flight Level 330
Estimating 56 North 020 West at 1310, 56 North 030 West Next”

(https://www.icao.int/EURNAT/EUR and NAT Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2FEURNAT%2FEUR and NAT Documents%2FNAT Documents%2FNAT Doc 007&FolderCTID=0x012000DAF95319EADD9946B510C5D7B595637D00AA5EB47B299B9A4BAD1968B24E18655C section 6.3 Position Reports)




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Simon Irvine

Thanks guys.

I'll get changes made to the document.



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • Harry Sugden
      By Harry Sugden
      Oooo, "cleared RNP approach runway 26L" soon come! 😎
      rnav to rnp.pdf
    • Sebastian Wheeler
      By Sebastian Wheeler
      Just a slight query related to the above:
      I was fortunate enough to partake in a weeks worth of work experience with NATS recently, and while at whitely on the ADC sims, I heard the following phraseology being used "G-ABCD, Cleared to enter controlled airspace via Route A, at or below altitude 2000 feet, QNH 1014."
      Upon asking one of the pseudo-pilots about the change, I was told it is "new phraseology" can anyone else confirm whether this is the case? Apparently, it was put in place after some confusion from pilots after receiving a "not above" clearance.
    • Steve Riley
      By Steve Riley
      Just reading the new sid charts , am I right in saying hand offs are going to LONDON or SCOTTISH  and not radar as no mention of Radar on the charts.
      2. After departure, aircraft shall remain on the Tower frequency until instructed. 3. En-route cruising levels will be issued after take-off by 'London Control'. 4. Report callsign, SID designator, current altitude and cleared level on first contact with 'London Control'.
      I have not got the old charts to confirm this as I take them straight from NATS web site. 
      Also frequencies have changed are we changing them within ES ?
        123.980, 131.005  BIRMINGHAM APPROACH/RADAR
        118.305  BIRMINGHAM TOWER
      121.805  BIRMINGHAM GROUND 

    • Thomas Wowk
      By Thomas Wowk
      As above, how do you guys assess the runway surface condition on VATSIM? Do you make a visual assessment from the visual control room in correlation to the current/prevailing weather conditions or do you assess this purely off the METAR/TAF?
      The only reason i ask it that the surface condition of a runway really affects our landing performance (each operators SOP's may be different for the same aircraft type) Specifically if the runway is declared as DRY full length our crosswind limitations may be increased, whereas if the runway is declared WET full length, crosswind limitations are decreased. If i also needed to return after departure due to an emergency and perform an overweight landing, a DRY/WET surface also makes quite a difference for our overall LDA requirements. 
    • Thomas Wowk
      By Thomas Wowk
      Hi all,
      For the ones who enjoy carrying out IFR circuits in large aircraft, Doncaster Sheffield (EGCN) accepts visual circuits for aircraft above 5,700kg - B737/B757/B767/B747 etc. 
      The circuit profile & procedure can be found in the textual data in the AIP for EGCN. Primarily speaking only one aircraft can be in the circuit at a time. Be nice to get TWR on at EGCN from time to time to accept more training traffic within the network.
      The circuit profile briefly summarised as below:
      Visual circuits by aircraft above 5700 kg must comply with the following noise abatement procedures.
      i. Runway 02 After departure turn right crosswind at no greater than 2.5 DME, fly downwind at 2000 FT QNH, report final south of Bawtry (3 DME) and not below 1500 FT QNH.
      ii. Runway 20 After departure climb on track 190°, at 1.5 DME turn left crosswind, fly downwind at 2000 FT QNH and report final not below 1500 FT QNH
  • Create New...