Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Maciej Olborski

atc-discussion NAECS - Volunteers needed

Recommended Posts

Dave James

Is this different to the controller tool that went on trial last June ?

What happened with that trial ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jonathan Derrick

I'd like to know a bit more about what I'm signing up for before I do so, could you expand on the concept please?

Jon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Michal Fira

Is this different to the controller tool that went on trial last June ?

What happened with that trial ?

Nope, it is still same tool we used during last CTP etc. It just requires more work to make it finished by the time of next CTP in march.

Michal

Edit:

Pinned

Edited by Michal Fira

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Michal Fira

Sneak Peak especially for you Dave :)

baw86_zps9010b798.png

systemc.png

Edited by Michal Fira

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maciej Olborski

I'd like to know a bit more about what I'm signing up for before I do so, could you expand on the concept please?

Jon

Jonathan, this controller tool was first introduced at the end of 2011 and it was created by me using some simple php/js that I knew, after feedback from diffrent people, me and Jan Duk(my friend who is a great web developer) have decided to write it from the scratch and make it really advanced tool for gander and shanwick controllers.

What we have already?

As you can see on pictures that Michal posted, we have some layout idea prepared, you can also do quite a lot of stuff with it already, it was used by 3 controllers during CTP for alpha testing. There was minor problems, mostly with complicated position reporting system but they were not a huge problems. Within the system you can already do stuff like:

  • Add aircrafts or for CTP import them from the CTP database
  • Select NAT view settings(which NAT's you want to see)
  • Select ATC position settings(between from Clearance Delivery/NAT Controller and Full controller)
  • Issue clearance to the added aircrafts(only real NAT's are done so far, random routings TODO)
  • File position report for each point of their NAT flight plan.

The system will already help you with separating the aircrafts in its most basic form, system uses, FL, distance between points and calculated speeds to calculate the ETA's for next points on the whole route. It will then choose all aircrafts on the same FL and same NAT and see if there will be any separation errors between them, if yes they will be displayed. In the future we are looking to make it suggest conflict resolution too.

I can say that project is at around its 55/60th % and if I can get a good team then the project can be ready for BETA pretty quickly.

Mac... :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Daniel Plumb

I was in the same position as Jon - I would like further information on the project.

After seeing the screenshots and reading the previous (more detailed) information, expect an application from me shortly. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maciej Olborski

Refresh. Is anyone else interested? So far I got one person :)

Mac... :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Morten Jelle

I wish i had some knowledge in programming. I would have been happy to help you out. I really miss a good tool for Oceanic controlling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paul Williams

Do you still need people, Maciej? I have many years experience in all of your listed skills...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maciej Olborski

Do you still need people, Maciej? I have many years experience in all of your listed skills...

Hi Paul, we are still looking for members yes, we just have two so any help will be appreciated. If you want to help us out please apply at http://www.maciejolborski.net/apply.

Mac... :ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Louis Hacking

The project was going really well - then most members disappeared, and the project stopped :L

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Claire Barton

Oscar,

 

This is not a controller pack its software for SHANWICK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Simon Irvine

I think we are looking to use GOATS this time for CTP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Callum McLoughlin

I hope they have all passed their validations, Simon. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • Chris Pawley
      By Chris Pawley
      Traffic Flow
      Traffic entering in the South West of the FIR will route towards Heathrow and Munich via the South coast and to Copenhagen and Warsaw via CPT and onwards.
      AC West is expected to see a large amount of inbound and overflying non-event traffic - for this reason - no inbound event traffic is routing via the BEDEK/KENET area.
       
      Traffic inbound at LIFFY and DEXEN will route to BNN for Heathrow, as well as to Amsterdam and Warsaw via LAMSO and into Scottish for Copenhagen. Some Copenhagen (via BPK) traffic will cross the Warsaw stream to LAMSO in the North Sea sector.
      Finally, traffic inbound to Heathrow will arrive via BEL & KELLY. This can be descended beneath the other streams.
      Daventry has mostly the responsibility to sequence for Heathrow arrivals. Clacton is staffed mostly for AMS <-> LHR city shuttlers
       
      Event Sectors
      Currently we plan to use the event split of AC West into North and South and AC North into Lakes and North Sea
       
      Neighbours
      Shannon is operating using this configuration: https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1fQU_ksQkb-jAlJ6fOQlp7JxAYI0uajPSc1v9Ii8mITI/edit?
      Amsterdam plans to use an East/West split (no Maastricht Delta online)
      Brussels may be covered by Eurocenter vACC
    • Chris Pawley
      By Chris Pawley
      Traffic Flow
      Traffic entering in at MOLAK will split into three - one section to Copenhagen, one to Munich at LONAM and one to Amsterdam at TOPPA
      Traffic entering at NIPIT routes via BEL and KELLY into AC Lakes. This might need to be descended slightly early to go beneath traffic in their sector.
      Traffic routing towards Copenhagen from AC North will cross both Amsterdam and Munich inbounds, hopefully with Amsterdam traffic already descending towards TOPPA.
       
      Event Sectors
      Currently we plan to use the event split of Scottish East into North and South
      We will open West+Deancross combined and East.
       
      Neighbours
      Shannon is operating using this configuration: https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1fQU_ksQkb-jAlJ6fOQlp7JxAYI0uajPSc1v9Ii8mITI/edit?
      Amsterdam plans to use an East/West split (no Maastricht Delta online)
      Copenhagen will use EKDK_N EKDK_V and EKDK_B
       

    • Martin Killner
      By Martin Killner
      Good Afternoon 
      Firstly, apologies if this topic is covered in other areas of the forum....I have carried out a search without a great deal of success. Secondly, this question has arisen after my inaugural full flight on VATSIM, from EGKK to EDDH on XP 11 with the FF A320, which was hugely enjoyable and fretful all at once.
      The majority of learning has been gained from "apron listening" to the various procedures. The one item I faced without any prior experience was the descent procedure. 
      As you know, the MCDU will give me a TOD point. I am happy that a radar or director controller will probably not be aware of this point and I will need to request it. This first flight resulted in a late descent pattern resulting in vectors to shed altitude, which I achieved readily enough. I was helped enormously by a very patient and understanding director and tower controller at EDDH...(Flight taken on 24/10/19 at about 1700Z. Thank you, by the way). 
      The question is: How far in advance of TOD should I carry out initial call up, (I am using the VATSIM P1 phraseology guide), to radar to assist in my calculated descent path, and is it acceptable to inform a controller if I anticipate a too steep a path due to control lags, (or most likely my incompetence)?
      p.s. Happy with the concept of track miles btw....
       
    • Robert Ispas
      By Robert Ispas
      Will other bookings (for example airports that are not taking part in the event) be valid for the day?
    • Paul Lee
      By Paul Lee
      Hi there all
      Looking to get back to controlling and starting by working EGNM
      I want to get back to LON N 
      Within the UK dowload the LON N prf is just blank when loaded into Euroscope 
      Other prf files for other sectors are all good.
      Does anyone have a prf file for LON N they could possibly share??
      Many thanks 
       
      Paul 
×
×
  • Create New...