Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Maciej Olborski

atc-discussion [NOTAM] EGPH Twy B Closed due WIP

Recommended Posts

Maciej Olborski

Hello folks,

A2207/12 NOTAMN

Q) EGPX/QMXLC/IV/NBO/A /000/999/5557N00322W005

A) EGPH B) 1208140445 C) 1209030445

E) BRAVO LINK CLSD TO ALL TRAFFIC DUE WIP

CREATED: 13 Aug 2012 14:00:00

SOURCE: EUECYIYN

So from tomorrow 14th August 0445Z until 3rd September 0445Z taxiway B will be closed due to Work In Progress. Therefore all aircraft arriving at Edinburgh should be asked to vacate via A1 when landing on runway 24 and all departures from runway 06 must depart from A1. Lets try to follow it on VATSIM, could be fun! :)

Mac... :ph34r:

Edited by Maciej Olborski

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lewis Hardcastle

thanks for update, very useful, will continue sending tommorow as had to leave :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Miroslaw Majerczuk

Very good idea. as real as it gets. I am also proposing to use any other restrictions that are currently in use at the airport in Edinburgh. When you know that the airport is closed due to thunderstorm and planes are waiting in holding, we can try do the same. When it is snowy runway and temporarily closed, also for closing the runway at VATSIM. Maciek if you can,put all the new NOTAMs on the forum. It will be really real control and excellent realism for pilots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave James

EDIT: Apologies, forgotten to add the relevant quote:

I am also proposing to use any other restrictions that are currently in use at the airport in Edinburgh

Just a thought, so please dont whack me for it yes.

Pilots using FS9 dont have any runway contamination elements written into the sim or aircraft.cfg/air files, so will they be allowed to land as normal in the case of SNOCLO ? - or will these be blanket NOTAMS whereby you will not allow any landings at all (purely for simulation purposes).

Edited by Dave James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gunnar Lindahl

Just to clarify that VATSIM does not allow for SNOCLO, at least not in the forced sense. If EDI gets hit by a snowstorm the Scottish guys might want to make it more interesting for themselves and their pilots to SNOCLO and divert everything elsewhere, but if a pilot insists on landing there anyway they are free to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave James

Thanks Gunnar.

And, in the case of departures....well, its easy to figure out the effect that closing the runway (for what ever simulation purpose) could have on traffic figures.

Pilot sees station online, checks info - closed - fly from somewhere else.....

Edited by Dave James

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oliver Parker
Posted · Hidden by Harry Williams, August 14, 2012 - 4.2 Inflammatory & Irrelevant Posts – VATSIM-UK does not wish to discourage healthy debate and discussion of topics posted in this forum however posts that are made with the intent of arguing or “debating” in a defamatory, inflammatory and non-productive manner will not be tolerated.
Hidden by Harry Williams, August 14, 2012 - 4.2 Inflammatory & Irrelevant Posts – VATSIM-UK does not wish to discourage healthy debate and discussion of topics posted in this forum however posts that are made with the intent of arguing or “debating” in a defamatory, inflammatory and non-productive manner will not be tolerated.

Dave, it was an idea to increase realism now stop acting stupid, why would anybody on Vatsim close the runway at the airport they are controlling?

At least put some thought into the points you are making.

Share this post


Link to post
Gunnar Lindahl
Posted · Hidden by Harry Williams, August 14, 2012 - No point in keeping it.
Hidden by Harry Williams, August 14, 2012 - No point in keeping it.

Dave, it was an idea to increase realism now stop acting stupid, why would anybody on Vatsim close the runway at the airport they are controlling?

At least put some thought into the points you are making.

I am typing from my phone so am unable to moderate, but you have about half an hour 'til I get home (or another staff member sees this) to remove or edit your post - completely unnecessary, uncalled for and, ironically, stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Dave James
Posted · Hidden by Harry Williams, August 14, 2012 - Avoiding arguments here Dave, you are not in the wrong.
Hidden by Harry Williams, August 14, 2012 - Avoiding arguments here Dave, you are not in the wrong.

Dave, it was an idea to increase realism now stop acting stupid, why would anybody on Vatsim close the runway at the airport they are controlling?

At least put some thought into the points you are making.

I will respectfully beg your pardon Oliver, theres no need for getting personal.

If you actually read the proposal in the thread above, you should see that it is to close the runway "to increase realism", it is not MY proposal my friend.

The points that I made are not stupid, they are valid sir, and are related to runway closure.

Again, if you read above, the reasons are given for the closure in the proposers text.

Share this post


Link to post
Oliver Parker

It is a given that traffic levels would decrease should the runway be closed.

Edited by Harry Williams VATUK9
4.2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maciej Olborski

Yeah, I'm not intending to force that :) Or anything else as pilots are free to do whatever they want on VATSIM. This B closure is just quite interesting one and it might make things bit different when you have an huge arrival stream cooming!

Mac... :ph34r:

Edited by Maciej Olborski

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jack Shaw

I think Callum Mc will only get this reference;

Adrian the pilot at Blackpool - 'The ILS is unserviceable' ...'Erm, its fine on my simulator' :blush: haha

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mateusz Zymla

I really like when we've got NOTAMs on VATSIM. I remember when veery long time ago I was PL-VACC controller, they've got normal NOTAM section, based on real -> Sometimes it's really cool when half taxiways are Work in Progress, and acfts are taxiing around all the airport, haha :D I think we should have more NOTAMs (based on real), too! It's more realistic, and pilots like it, too :).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • Kilian Thornton
      By Kilian Thornton
      Hi,
      I was wondering if we could reconsider the callsign allocated to the Scottish Sector covering the Strangford CTA and resultantly the Belfast TMA. This callsign is slightly frustrating when logged on as it does not show up on any of the VATSIM online viewers such as VATspy, Vroute, VATASTIC etc. and therefore is difficult to attract any sort of traffic when there is just the Belfast ATIS logged on. There is not much point of logging onto the position other than to surprise pilots going into AA/AC that there is actually ATC on. 
      Is this something we could revisit?
    • Arvid Hansson
      By Arvid Hansson
      To all controllers rostered on LTC/AC positions for the event tomorrow, here is a short briefing post with some key points all controllers should take into account:
      Any changes in availability must be reported as soon as possible to myself or Harry. Weaving together the roster with our current headcount has been somewhat of a challenge and we don't want any last minute surprises! Contrary to the post in the roster thread, there will not be an organised brief tomorrow afternoon. Any updates/further information will be communicated via this thread. Any questions can also be put here or directed to me or Harry directly. Stansted and Gatwick have been designated as the North/South diversion airports. If pilots indicate they're running out of fuel or they're holding past their bedtime, direct them to the nearest of these two airports straight away. No faffing about. Avoid holding aircraft at BRASO unless the BIG stack is or becoming full. It is more efficient to stack swap these aircraft to BIG. The same concept could potentially apply at WCO vs. OCK etc. but the LAM stream will be busier than the rest of the streams by far. Be proactive. Do not accept more planes if your sector is becoming too saturated. Do not blindly accept handoffs without knowing whether the aircraft will fit in your sector. Speak to your feeding sector and have them hold planes if necessary to avoid your own sector becoming a mess. This applies especially to the Clacton and TC East sectors, but all sectors with dense streams must make sure to stream aircraft at reasonable speeds. Don't have your stream at 280kts until reaching the stack. Reconsider all speed restrictions above 250kts when entering TCN/TCS sectors. It is imperative that pilots are able to reach holding speed in a timely manner for the holding to be efficient and consistent. Make sure pilots understand holding speed, do not be afraid to reiterate the speed in knots if they seem to not be fully understanding what they should do. Ask for lower speeds from your feeder if you are being offered planes that are too fast. It is OK and perfectly acceptable, but more importantly safe for departures to stay at 6,000ft for a while. Do not rush their climbs if it will cause unnecessary conflicts. Reiterate the 6,000ft restriction to pilots who sound like they need a refresher, and kindly advise pilots urging you for higher that it is not necessary. Speak to your neighbours! If we have EHAA/LFxx coverage, make sure they are away of how busy we are. Have them put planes on low mach numbers early, introduce MDIs at AMS, CDG, and other nearby airports if absolutely necessary and make sure they stay on top of their streaming game. If they don't, communicate and tell them what you need! Requesting 10-20 miles in trail if required is not unreasonable, and they should be able to accommodate. If we don't end up lucky enough to have neighbouring coverage, don't be afraid to take planes early if you have the capacity. Getting speed control sorted early or even holding planes outside the FIR if required will be a massive help. Use your breaks wisely. Drink water (or a beverage of your choice( @Lewis Hardcastle)) to stay alert and hydrated. Now, some "technical" things:
      Make sure you have the latest sector file (2019/01). I won't link to it here. If you don't know where to find it, kindly withdraw your name from the roster 😉 If you can, please update your Euroscope NavData to cycle 1901. This will ensure you have all new fixes, airways etc. which have been added recently. If you are not sure how to do this, speak to myself, Harry or someone who you think might know for assistance. Take a good look at the roster, make sure you understand and can picture the different splits - especially the LTC splits. Some sectors will consolidate onto TC bandbox, and some onto their parent sector which might look confusing if you don't see the big picture (sometimes they'll just close, though 🙂 ). Add this to your alias file. It includes all holding instructions we will realistically need and will save valuable RT time when pilots don't have the charts up. Do NOT spend unnecessary time trying to verbally give holding instructions more than once. If you need to repeat it, send the alias and be over with it. If you are interested, here are the predicted arrival frequencies from each stack over 30 minute intervals throughout the event (times shown are wheels down times):

      That was all for now. Don't forget that we are here to have fun, let's have a blast tomorrow! 😄
      @Phillip Speer @Callum Axon @Chris Pawley @Fraser Cooper @Matthew Burton @Sebastian Rekdal  @Lewis Hardcastle @Luke Collister @Dale Brooksby @Luke Brown
    • Harry Sugden
      By Harry Sugden
      Hi all,
      If there are any more C1s around to control for Real Ops, your help would be very much appreciated! Coverage on North and West (if we manage to get enough people) will help too - either book in the CTS or pop your name down on the post and we could roster some cover there.
      The more we can split, the more fun it'll hopefully be... at the moment it's just looking like unmanageable stress!
      Cheers
    • Callum McLoughlin
      By Callum McLoughlin
      I have booked LL INTN tomorrow evening between 5-10pm. If anybody would like to join in, perhaps even take FIN and S_APP, you'd be very welcome to. Perhaps it could be a little practice for the overload? I'm happy to swap around too if someone wants a go on N_APP.
      The offer is there, anyway 🙂 
×